| Home |  |
About | |
Music | |
Tech | |
Blog | |
Contact | |
Blog
|
Reality Upgrades – December 2009 In December 2009 we’ve learned.. - Machine converts thoughts into speech over FM radio broadcast > For more headlines and details, visit Reality Upgrades group on Facebook
Reality Upgrades – November 2009 In November we’ve learned.. - German physicists claim to have broken the speed of light > For more headlines and details, visit Reality Upgrades group on Facebook
They say that “time flies” and I suppose we’ve all noticed that. But what is time actually? Is it simply movement of things around the observer? We couldn’t tell if the time was passing unless there was forever changing environment poking our senses, right? In order to measure speed of an object we need a reference point which doesn’t move. Does that mean we couldn’t feel the time unless some part of us is located in timeless domain? How about feeling of lost time, the flow. Is it when your attention is synchronised with a movement so perfectly you’ll literally ride along with it? Just like two objects moving at the same speed to same direction seem to be still from each others viewpoint. Is this why tuning in with your breathing can produce sense of timelessness? So, feeling of time is related to our attention and how it relates to the movement around us. I have understood from older folks that this “time flies” phrase it’s actually quite recent expression. But didn’t time pass this fast hundred years ago? I remember how summers used to feel so much longer as a kid comparing to now. Maybe it’s partly because back then I didn’t have schedules but lived each day fully without looking back or forward. But maybe that’s only half of the story. Just like our physical 3D world is constantly changing, it’s reasonable to assume that also the time dimension is changing. Only way I know time can change is that things should happen slower or faster, right? If time feels faster now, maybe it actually is faster. But how’s that possible? As we know, a movie or an animation is created by displaying series of images. Faster rate makes smoother movement. Movies are playing at about 25 frames per second, depending on the format. If the time is speeding up, it doesn’t have to mean that our clocks should be running faster. It could be also that there are less frames per second or we’re just skipping frames, while participating “this movie” of life. Time could feel faster but still measure to be normal. Let’s take the movie example and go deeper. Frames of the images that make the movie can be printed on film. Film has infinite potential to display any kind of image and bright light source is needed for display. In my previous entry I was explaining how black holes could be event horizons, where matter of light pops in and out, creating illusion of movement. This theory comes from Nassim Haramein, describing how there is one little black hole inside every atom. Don’t you think these could be seen as kind of 3D pixels that are backlit by sun light? Now it’s already easy to see similarities between movie and this kind of model of reality. But there is more. If we would suddenly experience less frames per second time would feel different to us. Although a second would still last a second, inside that second we would receive less data than before. In other hand, each frame would stay there for longer time, allowing us to spend more “time” paying attention to the details of the image. This underlaying “time”, sort of master frame rate, could be related to the speed of light, the rate of how fast event horizon is breathing in and out. Also, each frame would be related to memory, which would be basically series of stored frames, moments in life. So, doesn’t it mean that faster time would also affect our memory, because we could store less information from the time period? Doesn’t it mean that older generation is not able to access all of their memories anymore? For an example, check out some of those CCTV recodings which are playing like one frame per second and compare it to actually being there when it happened. I can imagine how this sort of lower frame rate would also add to the creativity. More you spend time on watching something that is still, more you’ll have ideas about what you could add there. Increased creativity would be seen also as in advancement of technology. By diving deeper into the frames we would see see more details and it might make us to create more complicated and detailed systems, using smaller and smaller components, more categories and so on. But eventually we would find the surface of the film where it’s all fuzy and always ready to display any kind of picture. Maybe we would discover ourselves and find out we’re all part of that film we’re observing. From there our consciousness would be able to surpass the technology. Btw. I’m not claiming this to be true. I’m only exploring here, comparing real world to movies. Now let’s go to a movie theatre. Imagine that on the left side there is a guy observing the movement, flicking of the frames. On the right side there is another guy simply looking at the images, trying to ignore the movement. So what happens when frame rate goes down? The left side guy would be waiting longer and longer for the next image to appear, maybe starting to speculate how the next frame is going to be according to the previous one. Meanwhile the right side guy would be thrilled to be able to spend more time observing each frame. Sounds familiar? When frame rate would get very slow, each new frame would become more significant. But what if this decreasing in frame rate would continue until it would be considered stopped? What if.. by the time those two guys were watching practically a still screen, they would realise that the frames were always displaying something according to their reaction. From here they would be able to decide what kind of movie to see, until framerate would start to go up again. If matter isn’t really solid without an observer, isn’t it fair to assume that observer’s reaction is also essential? Or.. is it simply that our internal frame rate in relationship with universal frame rate through attention and focus, making time feel relative to invidual perspective? Is it possible that some grand planetary cycle would be able produce this type of phenomenon on us? Is time currently being replaced by the consciousness?
a new interview with Nassim Haramein As early as 9 years old, Swiss born Nassim Haramein was already developing the basis for a unified hyperdimensional theory of matter and energy, which he eventually called the “Holofractographic Universe.” This unification theory, known as the Haramein-Rauscher metric (a new solution to Einstein’s Field Equations that incorporates torque and Coriolis effects) and his most recent paper The Schwarzschild Proton, lays down the foundation of what could be a fundamental change in our current understandings of physics and consciousness. This groundbreaking theory has now been delivered to the scientific community through peer-reviewed papers and presentations at international physics conferences. Further, The Schwarzschild Proton paper has recently received the prestigious “Best Paper Award” in the field of physics, quantum mechanics, relativity, field theory, and gravitation at the University of Liège, Belgium during the 9th International Conference CASYS’09.
We all know that this world has three dimensional space and one dimensional time, let’s call it 3/1. Now there have been lot of confusion about the quantum world because the matter can exist in multiple states at once. There are also theories about paraller universes etc but maybe it can all fit together in simple, yet amazing way.. Since everything seems to be dual in nature (day/night, hot/cold, etc) let’s assume that also the reality has it’s opposite double somewhere. If we invert 3/1 the result is 1/3, where the reality would have one dimensional space and three dimensional time. One dimensional space would certainly feel different if we’re only able to observe what we see but not to move in it like we’ve used to. Three dimensional time means we could move back and forth in past, present and future (non-linear time).. That would be possible if the space (matter) would have multiple possibilities in the time. Simply, you could go to any point of time and decide what you would see there. But now at this moment we’re observing just one of the possibilities where we can move freely in space, observing the time. If there is such opposite reality it would make sense that we’re experiencing them both, maybe not simultaneously but by turns, one at the time. So perhaps during the dream we’re actually experiencing the alternate 1/3 reality. If we’re able to simulate different types of situations somewhere out there is it then safe to assume that there is somekind of interaction between the two realities where our actions in one somehow mirrors into the other? This model opens up a possibility that there might be some sort of gate between these two realities. First thing that comes to mind is black hole, singularity. If you go deep enough, will you come out from the other side? They say ‘dreams come true’ but can we actually change the reality from the inside?
Enter your password to view comments
All physics teachers might be going back to school
Nassim Haramein on Coast2Coast radio
> Relax your way to perfect health Older Posts » |